<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<ListRecords>

<record>
<header>
<identifier>oai:ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk:uuid:114b4a96-ea12-45b6-a918-bd4bd8348115</identifier><datestamp>2009-03-24T10:14:10Z</datestamp><setSpec>objects</setSpec><setSpec>PUB</setSpec></header>
<metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Unemployment duration, job search and labour market segmentation: Evidence from urban Ethiopia</dc:title><dc:identifier>http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/main-wps.html</dc:identifier><dc:date>2008</dc:date><dc:creator>Serneels, Pieter</dc:creator><dc:description>Although it is a common theoretical assumption that the chances to find a job fall with time in unemployment, this is not systematically confirmed by empirical evidence, and there is no evidence for developing countries. We develop a framework that allows us to test the four major explanations why we may observe non-negative duration dependence while genuine duration dependence is negative: financial support for the unemployed, active labour market policies, a change in the economy over time, and segmentation of the labour market into 'good' and 'bad' jobs. Using data for urban Ethiopia we observe a constant hazard while controlling for unobserved heterogeneity, and find that labour market segmentation is the only convincing explanation.</dc:description><dc:subject>Labour economics</dc:subject><dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject><dc:subject>unemployment</dc:subject><dc:subject>duration dependence</dc:subject><dc:subject>segmented labour markets</dc:subject><dc:subject>urban labour market</dc:subject><dc:subject>JEL: J64</dc:subject><dc:subject>JEL: C41</dc:subject><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/main-wps.html</dc:relation><dc:type>text</dc:type><dc:type>Working/Discussion paper</dc:type><dc:type>Published</dc:type><dc:type>Not peer reviewed</dc:type><dc:type>Author's Original</dc:type><dc:format>Published</dc:format><dc:identifier>Oxford Research Archive - Handle URL: http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk:8081/10030/2548</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>Oxford Research Archive internal ID: ora:2548</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ora:2548</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>urn:uuid:114b4a96-ea12-45b6-a918-bd4bd8348115</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc></metadata><about><provenance><originDescription harvestDate="2009-01-23T10:30:18Z"><baseURL>http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk:8080/fedora/oai</baseURL><identifier>oai:ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk:uuid:114b4a96-ea12-45b6-a918-bd4bd8348115</identifier><datestamp>2009-01-23T10:30:18Z</datestamp><metadataNamespace>http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/</metadataNamespace></originDescription></provenance></about></record>
</ListRecords>