|
|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Malthus irrelevant? |
Full text
http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=1652 |
Date
2005 |
Author(s)
Ziesemer, T. |
Abstract
We estimate and make population forecasts with Foley?s (2000) model in three different ways. The population forecasts for high, middle and low-income countries are quite good and suggest that the omitted variable bias from its simplicity is small. Estimation of the model as a system shows that indeed Malthusian behaviour - defined as increasing population growth through increasing per capita income - cannot be found for any of the income groups of the Worldbank classification nor for Sub-Saharan Africa, and also not for countries with per capita income below $1200 in a panel estimate. For world aggregate data and for the low-income countries we find increasing returns to scale, but for the other groups decreasing returns (outweighed by a positive time trend except for Sub-Saharan Africa and the u1200 group). For the panel of countries with income below $1200, per capita income is stagnant for the period 1970-2002 in spite of the positive growth rates of the period 1991-2002. The time trend is as strong as the population growth in connection with decreasing returns to scale. Together with the absence of Malthusian behaviour this seems to suggest a strong role for the population growth problem as seen by David Ricardo. |
Subject(s)
economic development and growth (JEL: O) |
Publisher
University Maastricht. FdEWB. MERIT |
Type of publication
Research paper |
Format
application/pdf |
Source
2005-010 |
Rights
University Maastricht. FdEWB. MERIT, 2005 |
Repository
Maastricht - University of Maastricht
|
|
Added to C-A: 2008-12-22;03:39:44 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2025 | Last update: Saturday, February 1, 2025 |
Webmaster
|