|
Advanced search
Previous page
|
Title
The Implications of the European Union's Democracy Promotion on Elections in Hybrid Regimes: A Comparative Case Study of Zimbabwe and Cambodia. |
Full text
http://hdl.handle.net/1887/52477 |
Date
2017 |
Author(s)
Kyerewaa, Silvia Asiedu |
Contributor(s)
Verver, Michiel |
Abstract
The main aim of this thesis is to explore the implications of democracy promotion on ensuring free and fair elections in hybrid regimes. Despite the recent wave of democratization, some countries have plunged back into authoritarianism. These regimes combine both democratic and authoritarian principles. Resultantly, they are referred to as hybrid regimes. The most common democratic feature that these hybrid regimes adapt are multiparty elections. However, elections in hybrid regimes are characterized by rigging of elections and serious human rights violations. Consequently, the international community has renewed its democracy promotion efforts. Similarly, the European Union (EU) has strengthened its democracy promotion in hybrid regimes with a focus on elections. This thesis seeks to answer the research question: What are the implications of the European Union's democracy promotion on elections in Zimbabwe and Cambodia? The research question shall be answered through a comparative case study on the implications of the EU's democracy promotion on elections held in Zimbabwe and Cambodia from 2000 to 2013. Both case studies shall examine how internal factors (local factors within the countries) and external factors (weaknesses inherent in the EU's democracy promotion) influence the EU's efforts to ensure free and fair elections in hybrid regimes. |
Subject(s)
Democracy; Democracy promotion; Elections; Hybrid regimes; Human rights; Political rights; European Union; Zimbabwe; Cambodia |
Language
en |
Type of publication
Master thesis |
Repository
Leiden - University of Leiden
|
Added to C-A: 2017-09-06;09:26:51 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2024 | Last update: Friday, March 8, 2024 |
Webmaster
|