|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Subalternity and counter-revolution: the social drivers of the Egyptian state transformation |
Full text
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/37599; http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/880 |
Date
2020 |
Author(s)
D'Aria, Maria |
Contributor(s)
Stein, Ewan; Allinson, Jamie |
Abstract
Many scholarly works address extensively the causes of revolution, but surprisingly
little work has been done to develop a theory on counter-revolution. Generally,
counter-revolution has been understood simply as the failure of revolution; counter-revolution is rarely considered as a process in its own right. This thesis argues that
counter-revolution is an important form of the transformation of state'societal
relations that should be investigated in its own right, and not merely regarded as 'failed
revolution' or as the restoration of the pre-revolutionary order.
Between 2011 and 2013, Egypt experienced two uprisings. In 2011, the mass
uprising led to the resignation of Mubarak and put his 30-year rule to an end, while in
2013 a second mass uprising allowed the military to take full control of the country.
Therefore, Egypt provides an excellent example, and the opportunity for a better
understanding, of counter-revolution. Revolutionary studies have failed to explain why
the Egyptian revolution was so fragile. What was a promising start to the
democratisation process, with free parliamentary and presidential elections, came to
an abrupt end and remained misunderstood as counter-revolution.
To address an important question regarding the study of the Egyptian counter-revolution, this thesis builds on the work of Antonio Gramsci, by reinterpreting its
concept of subalternity ' social groups who lack political power. This new
interpretation of the concept of subalternity allows this thesis to argue that the
Egyptian counter-revolution was not the result of a top-down restoration process due
to the exclusion of civil society; rather, that it was the result of the shifting alliance
between civil society groups and the military.
This work aims to make a threefold contribution: (1) to establish a model that
explains counter-revolution as the outcome of the open-ended revolutionary process
depending on the interaction of the state transformation and the autonomy of civil
society. I argue that the counter-revolution was the result of the power dynamics
between the military, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the revolutionary movements. (2)
To apply the concept of subalternity to the case of counter-revolutionary Egypt. This
thesis identifies the main weaknesses that characterise the fragility of the
revolutionary process. By comparing the strategies used by different social groups
during the 2011 uprising, I seek to show that the strategy of cooperation used by the
Muslim Brotherhood, while initially successful, failed to conquer political power because it excluded the confrontational strategy of revolutionary movements. (3) To
reconsider state'society relations in Egypt. The post-coup state is not based on form
of corporatism as was the case pre-2011; rather, Sisi's regime attempts to allow a
meaningful participation of social forces in the formation of the counter-revolution
state.
By looking at the social drivers of the counter-revolution in Egypt through the lens
of subalternity, this thesis offers a better understanding of the relationship between
structure and agency during counter-revolutions that could be applied beyond the
case of Egypt |
Subject(s)
counter-revolution; Egypt; subalternity; state transformation; autonomy of civil society; Muslim Brotherhood; post-coup state |
Language
en |
Publisher
The University of Edinburgh |
Type of publication
Thesis or Dissertation; Doctoral; PhD Doctor of Philosophy |
Format
application/pdf |
Rights
2021-11-30 |
Repository
Edinburgh - University of Edinburgh
|
Added to C-A: 2021-05-12;10:50:32 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2023 | Last update: Friday, April 14, 2023 |
Webmaster
|