|
Advanced search
Previous page
|
Title
A social ontology of 'maximal' persons |
Full text
http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/25537; http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/24862 |
Date
2021 |
Author(s)
Oyowe, Oritsegbubemi Anthony |
Abstract
In this paper, I address a range of arguments put forward by Kwame Gyekye (1992) and Bernard Matolino (2014) denying Menkiti's twin propositions that persons differ ontologically from human beings and that human attitudes, behaviours and practices constitute persons in social reality. They argue that his account of 'maximal' persons, rooted in African traditional thought-worlds, conflates issues and ultimately involve him in a category mistake. I argue that their arguments do not succeed, and that Menkiti's view is not in any predicament because of them. Then, I draw on John Searle's account of social ontology to clarify the sense in which attitudes, behaviours and practices are constituents of persons. Thus, I characterise persons as social entities belonging in a social ontology. Finally, I argue that realism regarding persons is not undermined by the threat of conventionalism lurking behind the view. - Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005156 - National Research Foundation
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001321 - Peer Reviewed |
Subject(s)
African; community; conventions; person; realism; social ontology; 150 Psychologie; ddc:150 |
Language
eng |
Publisher
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |
Type of publication
article; doc-type:article; publishedVersion |
Format
application/pdf |
Rights
(CC BY 4.0) Attribution 4.0 International; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Identifier
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/25537-4; 10.1111/jtsb.12312; 1468-5914 |
Repository
Berlin - Humboldt University of Berlin
|
Added to C-A: 2022-06-29;10:13:28 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2024 | Last update: Saturday, July 6, 2024 |
Webmaster
|