|
Advanced search
Previous page
|
Title
Regional devolution in the southern Sudan, 1972-1981 |
Full text
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/7137 |
Date
1982 |
Author(s)
Arou, Mom Kou Nhial |
Abstract
This is a study of Regional devolution granted to the Southern
Provinces of the Sudan in 1972. It seeks to answer five basic
questions: what was the basis of North-South conflict; why and
in what way was it possible to resolve the conflict in 1972;
what is the nature of the devolved system both in terms of the
powers of Southern institutions and in terms of their actual
roles in Southern and Sudanese politics; to what degree has devolution
proved both successful in its objectives in resolving
the North-South conflict and in providing efficient government
for the South; and finally, is devolution to persist as a form
of government in the Sudan.
CHAPTER ONE briefly describes the geography, demography and
colonial history of the Southern Sudan and shows that the South
is fragmentary, culturally and physically, but also distinct
from and largely isolated from the North. Those processes like
education and economic devolopment, which might have brought
about integration between the North and South, were impeded
by the colonial policy of separate control of the two regions
and the neglect of the development of the Southern economy,
-which placed the southern elite in a weak position to defend
regional interests as independence approached.
CHAPTER TWO is concerned with the politics of the Civil War
(1955-72), its background, evolution and the development of the
devolutionary solution. It shows that the devolutionary solution
was possible in 1972 because both the northern and southern
leadership were now willing to compromise rather than to continue
the war, which none of them felt it would win by force.
CHAPTER THREE attempts to trace the precise steps leading to the
devolutionary solution. It focuses its attention on the June 9th
Declaration, southern responses and the role played by the mediators
in reaching such solution as well as the nature of what
was agreed upon.
CHAPTER FOUR discusses the steps taken and trends set during
the transition phase between the Addis Agreement and the establishment
of the first PRA. It also analyses the first elections
to the newly-created Regional Assembly and indicates that these
brought into renewed prominence the factional and sectional politics
which had characterised Southern politics since 1948.
CHAPTER FIVE discusses the devolved powers to the Region as
well as the working of the Regional Assembly and High Executive
Council. It also examines the course of both internal Southern
politics and of its relationship with Central Government
and the Northern-dominated political system.
CHAPTER SIX discusses the internal conflict which developed
after the establishment of the institutions of Devolution, as a
result of intra-elite struggle for power and control of the Regional
Government. This growing pattern of factional competition
coincided with growing Presidential intervention and contributed
to undermining the integrity of Southern institutions and, thus,
to growing civil discontent and disorder in the South, at the
end of the first decade of devolution.
CHAPTER SEVEN assesses the devolutionary solution against the
underlying causes of North-South conflict and attempts to answer
the question: In as the devolved system of Government
worked in a backward country like the Sudan and will it continue
in existence? |
Subject(s)
Political; science; Public; administration |
Language
eng |
Publisher
University of Edinburgh |
Type of publication
PhD Doctor of Philosophy |
Format
application/pdf |
Identifier
331048 |
Repository
Edinburgh - University of Edinburgh
|
Added to C-A: 2022-08-22;11:49:56 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2024 | Last update: Saturday, July 6, 2024 |
Webmaster
|