|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Governing the covid-19 pandemic in the Middle East and North Africa: Containment measures as a public good |
Full text
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18763375-13040003; https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3249253 |
Date
2021 |
Author(s)
Koehler, K.; Schulhofer-Wohl, J. |
Abstract
What determined how governments in the Middle East and North Africa reacted to the global COVID-19 pandemic? We develop a theoretical argument based on the political costs of different policy options and assess its empirical relevance. Distinguishing between the immediate costs associated with decisive action and the potential costs of uncontrolled spread that are likely to accrue over the long term, we argue that leaders who have fewer incentives to provide public goods to stay in power will lock down later than their more constrained counterparts. We find empirical support for this argument in statistical analyses covering the 1 January ' 30 November 2020 period using the Oxfordcovid-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) and our own original data on the timing of mosque closures and strict lockdowns across the region. We also illustrate our argument with a description of the response to the pandemic in Egypt. - Institutions, Decisions and Collective Behaviour |
Subject(s)
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Public health; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Containment; Lockdowns; Leader survival; Political regime type; Winning coalition size; MENA |
Language
en |
Type of publication
Article / Letter to editor; info:eu-repo/semantics/article; Text |
Format
application/pdf |
Source
Middle East Law and Governance |
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Identifier
doi:10.1163/18763375-13040003; lucris-id:433472951 |
Repository
Leiden - University of Leiden
|
Added to C-A: 2022-11-16;10:37:26 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2023 | Last update: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 |
Webmaster
|