|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Why Hadza is (probably) not Afroasiatic: a discussion of Militarev's 'Hadza as Afrasian?' |
Full text
https://www.jolr.ru/index.php?article=334; https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3720177 |
Date
2023 |
Author(s)
Sands, B.; Harvey, A.; Mous, M.P.G.M.; Tosco, M. |
Abstract
<strong></strong>Problems with the lexical evidence used to posit Hadza as an Afroasiatic language are discussed. The failure to identify certain loanwords and the misanalysis of certain Hadza morphemes are problems rectified by having greater familiarity with Hadza and its linguistic contact history. Other problems are more general to the specific methodology employed. The overly wide semantic range of meanings often allowed in establishing form-meaning sets increases the likelihood of chance resemblances. The use of certain words that are likely onomatopoeic also reduces the impact of the proposed cognate sets. Ultimately, it is the lack of regular, repeated sound correspondences between Hadza and Afroasiatic that makes the proposal of their familial relationship unconvincing.<strong></strong> - Descriptive and Comparative Linguistics |
Subject(s)
Language isolates; Hadza language; Khoisan languages; Cushitic languages; Afroasiatic languages; Chadic languages; Long-distance relationship |
Language
en |
Type of publication
Article / Letter to editor; info:eu-repo/semantics/article; Text |
Source
Journal of Language Relationship |
Identifier
lucris-id:1271721806 |
Repository
Leiden - University of Leiden
|
Added to C-A: 2024-03-18;09:06:14 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2025 | Last update: Saturday, February 1, 2025 |
Webmaster
|