|
|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Adaptation of the G-NORM (Gender norms scale) in Uganda: An examination of how gender norms are associated with reproductive health decision-making. |
Full text
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kz3m9t7; https://escholarship.org/content/qt5kz3m9t7/qt5kz3m9t7.pdf |
Date
2024 |
Author(s)
Sedlander, Erica; Granovsky, Rachel; Birabwa, Catherine; Amongin, Dinah; Wasswa, Ronald; Diamond-Smith, Nadia; Waiswa, Peter; Holt, Kelsey; Bingenheimer, Jeffrey |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Restrictive gender norms exacerbate health inequalities all over the world. More specifically, they prevent women from seeking preventive health services, constrain womens economic empowerment, and are associated with reproductive health decision making. Gender norms, a subset of social norms, are dynamic and change over time. However, we lack data on how they are changing and how these changes affect health outcomes because current measures do not adequately capture the complex concept of gender norms. METHODS: We originally developed and validated a gender norms scale, the G-NORM, in India. In this study, using cross-sectional data, we adapted the G-NORM from Southeast Asia (India and Nepal) to sub-Saharan Africa (Uganda) in four steps: 1. Formulation of new scale items (via qualitative analysis) 2. Cognitive Interviewing 3. Questionnaire Administration (n = 2422 women of reproductive age) and 4. Psychometric analysis (Confirmatory Factor Analysis). RESULTS: Like the original scale, descriptive norms and injunctive norms comprised two unique sub scales with high Cronbachs alphas (.80 & .92). Average scores differed depending on the type of norm suggesting that some gender norms are changing faster than others. Specifically, more equitable injunctive norms were associated with lower odds of partner-dominated contraceptive decision making but descriptive norms were not. CONCLUSIONS: Gender norms serve as a multi-faceted determinant of health and wellbeing and require measurement tools which account for their conceptual complexity. Validating the G-NORM in Uganda expands measurement options for researchers in the sub-Saharan African region working to change norms to reduce health inequalities or to understand the gender normative context before beginning a study. |
Subject(s)
Humans; Female; Uganda; Adult; Reproductive Health; Decision Making; Social Norms; Cross-Sectional Studies; Male; Young Adult; Adolescent; Psychometrics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Middle Aged; Gender Identity |
Publisher
eScholarship, University of California |
Type of publication
article |
Format
application/pdf |
Source
PLoS ONE, vol 19, iss 11 |
Rights
public |
Identifier
qt5kz3m9t7; info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0308249 |
Repository
Berkeley - University of California
|
|
Added to C-A: 2024-11-20;09:48:22 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2025 | Last update: Saturday, February 1, 2025 |
Webmaster
|